Comments on: A Capitalist India

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:24:29 +0000

I personally think taht evey model, be it capitalist, socialist and mixed will work out just fine. The problem arisies when there is coruption. As you have pointed out, it was the Left Front which was ruling at the time of the incident, but still it happened. Why? Because the people running teh party staryed from their idealogy(maybe it was for the good or for the bad)(the Nano plant didn’t happen, I believe it was necessary for the development of Bengal(mixed approach is needed)….

re the NREGS: Again..th e scheme is good..but implementation is a key factor…

Privatisation is good, but it should help in all round growth. Therefore, as you have written, the mixed approach is the best fo r India..but more imporatntly, we need better people to run the country

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:22:02 +0000

By: Rohan

Rohan — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:50:40 +0000

“India is a Third-World Country. It is a developing economy. It started out as a mixed economy.”

I think it started out as a socialist economy. If you call that situation mix then mixed economy was the most dangerous thing (resulted in less than 2% annual growth over the Nehru-Indira era..)

The real estate sector aint blooming now…. yeah it bloomed for half a decade but things are soar for more than a year now….

Everyone should get an equal chance….
very ambiguous statement indeed…
shed some light on it

The way out as I see is govt should do their own and let the pvt. co. do their own..
The govt. is there to protect rights and they should do that..I mean it’s just their fault..
Great economists do have solutions but the vote bank politics…argh…
Let’s hope something work out
though it looks like a dream to me….
The opposition has more issues to fight on… that’s bad thing in India….
All I can say is just hope and get into politics, civil services etc.