Live-In Relationships

OPINION | January 20, 2009 | Share

A walk down a flower laden aisle, circles around a sacred fire, or even simple signatures on a document; marriage has a different representation in different people’s minds, but for all, I am sure, its sanctity is utmost. A very normal situation has now arisen, that is slowly replacing these images, and that is of a live-in couple.

 

A live-in relationship is one in which two people, who are not married decide to live together in a house or flat and share a bedroom. If this idea was presented to our grandparents, they would gape at us, open-mouthed, and demand to know what devil had possessed us and made us think such insane thoughts! And who can blame them; such a situation is a very new one in the subcontinent, and has only started becoming popular over the past few years, and in essence, is preposterous.

 

People have become increasingly independent, and choose to live according to their own views, wants and needs. But the fact that the idea of live in relationships is popular does not mean that it is correct. Living in a conservative society, where only two decades ago, if a man and woman who were not legally married and were not from the same family, were seen together in public, were arrested on the charges of zina (pre-marital sex and adultery); the idea of an unmarried man and an unmarried woman living together is considered highly incorrigible. And with good reason too, for I have grown up being told that marriage holds more importance than any other relationship, and such a relationship is a violation of that very thought.

 

Pakistan is an Islamic country, with a clear majority of the people being Muslims, and in our religion, there is a strict rule against pre-marital sex; a live in relationship negates that very rule, as a couple that is living together is bound to be sleeping together too. In short, from a religious point of view, it is an unethical and immoral practice. Socially, live in relationships are not that widely accepted in the sub-continent, and are a common practice only in sprawling metropolitans like Mumbai, in India, and Karachi in Pakistan. Cities like Delhi and Lahore are, however, comparatively conservative in such matters.

 

The reason that such a category of a relationship took form is because of the highly promoted western culture. Live in relationships have been promoted by the media, even in Bollywood movies like, Salaam Namaste, which was actually a very bold step for the film industry. In reality, such relationships are not widely accepted, and not commonplace, at large. Such false depictions are spreading this trend in the upcoming generation, and are actually leading to threaten the integrity of the concept of marriage and are corrupting the sanctity of it. If a couple is ready to share all aspects of each other’s lives, they may as well enter into a marital union, rather than ruin the concept of it.

 

The generation gap between our generation and the one before us is a very large one, so the introduction and promotion of such ideas is going to widen the gap. Insightful communication is the only option that can help bridge that gap, but even though the previous generation is what we now call “old fashioned”, their policies seemed ethical enough to work. We need to take a leaf out of their book, and incorporate their views into our lives, for some of their concepts and practices seem far better than ours, now.

 

Khadija Ranjha
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 3.83 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
[Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2rokbotoy/303824345/]

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Related Views

6 Comments

  1. sayan das says:

    i agree, live in relations are not the right thing to do. after all marriage as a concept has lasted more than a millennium. co habitation is an absolute insult to marriage. the present governments decision to give legitimacy to live in relationships is appalling.

  2. kriti bajaj says:

    In other words, your objections to live-in relationships are based merely on the fact that they go against religion and are a result of the influence of the west?

  3. khadija says:

    Merely????? I think that is reason enough. The rules of my religion hold the utmost imporatance for me, it is not a “mere” reason, rather the fundamental one. As far as western influence is concerned, I said that that is how this concept started, not why I’m against it. Do u have stronger reasons??

  4. Rajesh says:

    Live in is not for an idiotic narrow minded society . Think of the thousands of cases of domestic violence and then decide whether to go in for a live in or not. Leave sex out of this .We are not kids that we cant take care of ourselves. Live in partners should decide whether they want kids or not, if not continue and enjoy your freedom as live in partners

  5. LawisGreek says:

    Well, it is way too early to even come into some kind of conclusion, especially when it comes to a concept called live-in relationship. I personally feel that this is a personal statement and practice, which young and old couples alike prefer. We have also viewed our expressions, please have a look at this article.
    http://www.lawisgreek.com/live-in-relationships-supreme-court-verdict/

  6. pushkar says:

    i cant guess whats wrong with you people.where ever you go you just start shouting my islam my islam,cant u people come out of that scenarion and have some broader thinking atleast you should try to have it audkos.

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 9 + 2 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is: