Narcoanalysis for Criminal Investigation

  • Sharebar

Narcoanalysis is a tool which is being used by investigating agencies in criminal cases, as an interrogation technique. It was first used in 2002, in the Godhra carnage probe. During the Telgi scam, the use of narcoanalysis came under the scanner, and recently it was used in the Arushi murder investigation. The scientific validity of the test has been questioned by medical professionals, and the legal validity has also been debated in several international and national cases.

Narcoanalysis is based on the principle that a person is able to lie using his imagination and, therefore, under the influence of the test the capacity of his imagination is blocked, by leading the person into a semiconscious state. Hence whatever the person says is restricted to the facts that he is aware of. Narcoanalysis involves the use of certain barbiturates, using sodium pentothal. It is used in conjunction with other tests – polygraph, or the lie detector test, psychological profiling and brain mapping.

The validity of the test however is disputed. Some medical professionals and doctors say that the test is quite accurate and is a peaceful method for extracting the truth from the accused. Others, point out that under the influence of the drug, the accused has garbled speech and tends to talk about fantasies, and labours under delusions. For example, a person may talk about a crime s/he fantasized about committing, even if they actually have not done it. Their state resembles that of a person in delirium, so these tests are highly inaccurate. There is no way of distinguishing reality from fantasy. P. Chandra Sekharan, President of the Forensic Science Society of India, says that not only are narcoanalysis tests unreliable, they may also lead to dangerous side effects. The truth serum substance, sodium pentothal is the same substance that in larger dosages is used to induce a deep coma like state for executions by lethal injection in USA. A large dose of the drug is lethal; a test could result in coma or even death. It can be difficult to determine the correct dose of the drug.

In the United States of America, the New Jersey Supreme Court banned the use of narcoanalysis in Pitts. V. State for lack of scientific reliability. In India as well, the use of narcoanalysis has been questioned in courts. The main argument against Narcoanalysis is that it is infringement of the fundamental right under Article 20(3) of the Constitution, which provides for a privilege against self incrimination. It can also be construed as violative of the human rights of privacy, and the right to health.

At the same time, Narcoanalysis is an invaluable tool for investigators. Since the results of the test cannot solely be used to prove the guilt of the accused, advocates of narcoanalysis point out that it is not violative of the right against self incrimination. Statements made under the test have to be corroborated by further evidence. The most laborious part of a criminal investigation is extracting information from an uncooperative source, and therefore narcoanalysis provides a simply, non violent method of finding out the truth. In a world where until quite recently, torture was employed in criminal cases, perhaps narcoanalysis is a simple, civilized way of conducting criminal investigation.

Arya Raje

[Image courtesy:]

Write your opinions below

  1. The P. Chandra Sekharan, President of the Forensic Science Society of India, is an non existing society no where its name has come up. Who are the elected member and where the society is registered. MHS stated that it is fraud organization and Chandra shekaran himself a fraud keeps mentioning the name of organization. When law commission went to search the Forensic Science Society of India they could trace and henace he was questioned as why he keep mentioning non existing society called his letter as fake one and resubmitted to MHA to give information about Chandra shekaran. They wanted to know under fraud banner what illegal activities committed. The director and Chief forensic scientist mentioned that P. Chandrashekar is inovlving in such illegal activities at Bangalore as he was not encloraged at Chennai. People should be aware of the truth and not encourage him and senior police officers from Tamil Nadu in a press statment have stated that not give importanc e to chandra shekar as he belong to old school of thought and always criticizing the new technology and discouraging the people responsible in the development of technology using nwer concepts. If he is encouraged what about the country? how can they develop newer method when terrorist activities are increasing

  2. for the case of Kyron Hormon-missing for over a month, Im wondering if the use of narco analysis would prove to be helpful, not in prosecution persay, but in the criminal investigation part wanting to have the last person who saw him, and the same person who has already failed 2 polygraph tests TELL WHERE the child IS? would that work? people believe full heartedly that she holds the answer to where the missing 7 year old is. at least THEN he could BE FOUND, and the criminal case pursued after. I dont personally CARE who goes to jail, I just WANT THE CHILD FOUND.
    any ideas on this from a lawyer’s standpoint, or someone with any crediblity on the matter?

Share your views

Follow us

Share this article