Feb
15

kevin_carter.jpgIt is often said that that a photograph speaks more than a thousand words. Thus, when I sat down for my first photography lecture this semester, all I thought about photography was the volume of energy, color, charisma and vibration the lens portrays in front of us. One fifth of a second, and that’s exactly what it takes to make history. So, when it was my turn to become the next McNally, I thought of the best things to capture through my lens, colors, fast moving traffic at Marine Drives, couples cuddling at Carter Road, but, as I surfed the net to view some of the great works of some legendary photographers to get an idea, I came across Kevin Carter and I was zapped.


Kevin Carter was a South African photojournalist who won the Pulitzer, the most coveted prize for photography, in 1994 for the picture he clicked during a famine in southern Sudan. Two months after winning the most prestigious award, that is the most valued in a photographer’s life, Carter committed suicide. Shocking isn’t it? Look at the photograph for a minute and then think. It’s a malnutritioned girl resting on her way to the UN camp in South Africa and a vulture next to her awaits her death. This depressing “positive” print reproduced on a photosensitive surface won him all the acclaim and fame that he had desired. After being presented the award, he was asked what had happened to the girl. However, he had no answer. He just said that the vulture flew away after sometime but he had no clue what had happened to the girl, if she had survived or not. The critics were harsh. This is when the ethics in photography were first questioned. A human being witnessing a sight like this and adjusting his lens to capture the misery rather than helping the half dead creature, can be described as nothing else but callous. Carter ended his life on the 27th of July 1994, stating himself as depressed and unhappy with the situations around him. He said that he was haunted by the vivid memories of corpses, anger and pain.

David Bailey once stated that, “with photos I always think I am looking at something dead.” In an incident that occurred at the Gateway of India three years ago, when a lady was killed by a lunatic, a leading magazine carried a picture of her slit throat while her eyes were looking at the lens. The magazine also carried a photograph of her, still alive, pleading to the man, who was behind the camera and adjusting his lens, to save her from the lunatic. This is where the dark side of this profession appears, when you forget the fact that you are a sensitive person, before being a photographer.

Photography has come under serious criticism at times like these and this really makes us wonder whether this is the kind of stuff that we actually thought photography is about? The colors are there, the background is amazing, patterns and geometry, content, composition and detailing is commendable, but, are they the only things a photograph is all about? Where did the deeper meaning vanish? There is a thin line between being a professional and a cold-blooded living being. This is the line which the photographers need to define for themselves.

Aakanksha Ahluwalia

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 4.13 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading …

Sphere: Related Content

Relevant Articles . . .

  • None Yet


Comments:
Kulsoom on February 15th, 2008 at 1:10 am |

amazing.

and i always thought of photography as my refuge.

Shruti on February 15th, 2008 at 10:40 pm |

Brilliant piece Akanksha. Possibly one of the best I’ve read on the VP site. Its refreshing, and makes you think.

Avantika on February 16th, 2008 at 8:59 am |

While adhering to professionalism many people forget that they’re first a person and then a professional. A well written article Akanksha. I hope more people will read this as it isn’t just related to photography.

Samarjit Singh Khanna on February 17th, 2008 at 12:00 am |

Absolutely loved the article…very thought provoking indeed. Reminds me of the time when that young lad burnt himself during the Anti reservation riots and all journalists were busy capturing footage rather than helping him.
I guess we are humans before anything else…..its high time we realised that!!

Harshita on February 19th, 2008 at 9:52 pm |

This article is very interesting for me, personally, because this exact topic had come up for discussion in our circle some days ago, and I felt the very same problem this article addresses. And funnily, the photograph in question was the very same one you’ve used. :)

One of the very interesting comments that came up from a guy whose dad has been in the media for a verry long time is that, in his experience press people have to learn to detach themselves at the sight of suffering, for their job is to report it as news. There’s no way that this detachment can be complete of course - as in the case of Carter’s suicide. But he argued that reporters, and I guess photographers as well, have to compartmentalise to a certain extent in order to do their job and do it well.

Another thing I’d like to share - perhaps, a hands-on approach of helping out in the immediate context can’t be the only way of expressing one’s humanity? Carter’s photograph for one- has captured the suffering and anguish of an entire region and generation and pricked the world’s conscience, made it sit up and talk about it. I think that is a great humane service in itself.

Express your views on this article
Name: 
Email: 
A/S/L: 
Mobile # : 
Views 
 



Rajinder Puri

Do More With The Viewspaper


RSS

Podcasts



Latest Video Reports



The Viewspaper Insight Of the Day



Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.