It’s here. Kalyug. This has to be the moral collapse that our honorable, omniscient ancestors oversaw. Why, almost everyday one reads of outrageous females who forget their place in society, throw temptation in the face of innocent men, and then holler indecently for “justice” when some poor man is provoked into touching them, which is what they secretly desire, in the first place.
What? You say women don’t dress or behave with the intention of getting men to rape them? Why of course they do – why else would they wear such clothes – clothes that make it obvious that – oh, for the sake of the good lord – that they have a body! Shouldn’t they cover up fully so that they do not throw the – the utterly provoking fact – that they have a body – in the face of poor men who (naturally) have a weakness for female bodies?
What? You say they have a right to dress the way they want to? Why – why – of course they don’t – because– well, if they have a right to dress the way they want to, men (naturally) have the right to rape them if they want to, isn’t it?
Why, that’s pure logic – why, it’s undebatable logic – why, it’s simply brilliant of me to be able to think this up. The world, especially the women of the world, has fully forgotten the unimpeachable rules of conduct as prescribed by The Great Indian Culture. And the recent Guwahati molestation is the most scandalizing example in this regard.
Most of my intelligent country-mates have not been spoiled by baseless ideas of gender equality, and hold opinions similar to mine, as is evident from their reaction to the video of the incident which I have gratefully quoted. “Girls always face this since they don’t know what is right and wrong. I am in class 12. And my age is 17. I will be 18 in September. I don’t even go to a cinema hall. My question is why should a girl of class 11 go to a night club? No girl should go to night club. Yes girls can enjoy in a party, but she can’t go to night clubs.”
Instead of politely declining invitations to party at indecent places which are full of men and alcohol, and men who (naturally) consume a lot of alcohol, and who are (naturally) quite prone to behave like, well, men – instead of keeping at home after six like a self-respecting woman ought to, the girl had the audacity to go to a party, at night, in a pub!
For the sake of God! What can a man with an ounce of hormone in him do when he encounters a girl as cheap as that? Why, when a woman shows she is willing by going to pubs, won’t men, being men, take advantage of the situation? “Doesn’t a girl know how to wear a decent dress? Why the hell should she wear such a provoking dress and go to dance club in the night and drink?”
“Does anyone know why the outsiders attacked that girl only? Since the girl’s dress changed the mentality of those guys, which makes them want to molest. This won’t happen if the girl doesn’t wear such a dress.”
The society, which has full right to control the life and activities of a woman, because, well – its society – can still forgive her being overtly adventurous and daring to go to a pub. But the clothes that she wore! How absolutely shameless of her to expose 19 percent of her neck, 33 percent of her arms and (God save the world), 61 percent of her legs?
How could she have dared to look attractive and sexy at night and prey upon the weaknesses of men who happened to see her? By what right can she claim justice now, now that her clothes and the lack of them makes it obvious that she was was asking to be raped? (Women of this sort enjoy rapes, if you did not know).
And maybe much more than that; for who can vouch for the character of a girl who dresses like that? It is definitely to the credit of the fine gentlemen who exercised self control and did not rape her, as she really deserved, blessed be their sense of pity.
“First the girl should be arrested as she was a teenager and at this age, she isn’t permitted to drink alcohol. Further,it seems in the video she instigated the crowd.” Kudos to this person for finally talking sense. Instead of diverting from the real issue at hand and laying the blame on men who were enticed by the impudence of the girl (who is most probably a black-hearted temptress, like most women who are not well-bred bhartiya naris, are), we should concentrate on the larger concern. Which is, indeed, women who drink. And that too, before age.
How can women, who are designed to be delicate, dependent, homely, moralistic and so many other unbelievably pleasing things, think of besmirching their purity with alcohol? Women who drink alcohol, and that too with men, must know what is coming. Why, they hug men, often allow them to kiss, get intimate, share things about their life, and then – look at the preposterousness – expect to not be raped! As if all of the above is mere impulsive behaviour not intended to entangle men! And, Lord forgive them, some people have the audacity to claim that nothing warrants bodily assault.
Why, one pathetic person who has no respect for Indian culture (and must be hanged therefore), says that even if a woman is a prostitute, even if a woman gets intimate with you, even if a woman is stark naked – one does not have the right to her body unless she consents because -look at the absurdity -it’s hers! Why, a loose woman’s body is public property, yes, of course! What? You ask how? Well, because it is – because such is the law of God – oh, don’t keep asking how and why – because - oh, it just is.
If women are giving hints (and naturally men are adept at taking such hints), well, boys will be boys, won’t they? We need to reform the way our society thinks. We need to get the woman who brought such shame upon gentlemen who were tempted into unpleasant deeds, arrested.
Why, she should be flogged in public. Paraded naked too, so that our mothers and sisters get the message.
Why, we need to show a woman who’s the man. Most importantly, however, we need to put an end to this “rape” nonsense.
Everyone who lays claim to any amount of sense needs to realize that men are (naturally), superior by birth because they possess the wonderful (albeit overly sensitive) equipment (Why, this is certainly the most apt word English fellows have coined).
Also, by the virtue of that esteemed possession, they (naturally) have the unquestionable authority to decide which woman is looking to be touched.
Also, by the virtue of this authority, it is proved that (naturally) men don’t rape women at all. They simply punish women who are vulgar enough to imagine they can live their life their own way, especially when the “way” flares up the ever-so-dynamic equipment.
We need to take swift cognizance of the truth that is screaming in our faces.
Why, we need to realize that WOMEN RAPE THEMSELVES. Yes sir, they do. And don’t you dare to argue. Unless of course, you possess the equipment.